The Internet Theater Magazine of Reviews, Features, Annotated Listings







Etcetera and
Short Term Listings


NYC Restaurants


New Jersey







Free Updates
A CurtainUp Review
The Subject Was Roses

When I left home 3 years ago I blamed him for everything that was wrong here. . .when I came home I blamed you. . .now I see that no one is to blame. . .not even me.—Timmy
Matthew Amendt as Timmy Leary
(Photo: Sam Hough)
Long before the term dysfunctional was used to describe households in which tension and discontent were dished up with each meal, playwrights were writing dramas about such families. In 1964 one such drama, The Subject Was Roses, won Fank Gilroy a Pulitzer Prize. It also brought a Tony to a young actor named Martin Sheen for his role as a World War II soldier who returns to his family's Bronx home after three years overseas, quickly realizing that he has traded one battlefield for another.

With its two acts and six scenes playing out in a realistically furnished living room and kitchen setting (complete with period perfect enamel sink) The Subject Was Roses epitomizes the realistic, kitchen sink family drama. Timmy Leary, the son who loves his parents but needs to strike out on his own, is somewhat reminiscent of Warren Leight's narrator in Side Man. Even more so, the disappointed with life John Cleary and his escapades with women evokes memories of Arthur Miller's Willie Loman (a 1949 Pulitzer Prize winner). But the Leary saga is the stuff of a much smaller American tragedy than Death of a Salesman and without the poetry and memorable quotes. Actually it was the more nuts and bolts realism of Gilroy's play, the fact that his characters spoke the way ordinary people speak, that was praised by critics of the original production. But what was noteworthy then has long since become run of the mill.

But while The Subject Was Roses isn't exactly a modern classic with a must-see relevancy nowadays, it does offer three actors a chance to bring out the various shades of feelings in meaty roles. Its also timely in that its small cast and single set fit the economic needs of modern producers.

The recent revival at the Mark Taper in Los Angeles offset the play's dated label with a news making casting opportunity: Martin Sheen who went from his career making role as Timmy Leary to become President on TV's long-running West Wing, returned to his stage roots, now playing the senior Leary. It also featured the well-known actress Frances Conroy as his unhappy wife.

The Pearl Theater's production boasts no such celebrity cast. Timmy is played by Off-Broadway and Pearl Theater newcomer Matthew Amendt and Nettie and John Cleary by Pearl veterans Carol Schultz and Dan Daily. I didn't see the Los Angeles revival, but Schultz strikes me as much more in the mold of Patricia Neal than Ms. Conroy (Neal made an Academy Award nominated comeback after a stroke as the film version's Nettie).

Daily is quite ideally cast as the blustery but frustrated Irishman. Amendt is completely believable in the role that has enduring relevancy: a son who wants to know the parents he loves better, and who, having become his own man, knows he must leave them or risk once again being a pawn in their private war — a war that's an outgrowth of their struggles with the demons of infidelity, failed ambitions, a long buried child and forever lost happiness.

Under Amy Wright's direction, there's a nice bloom on this old-fashioned bouquet. With the action confined to the Leary apartment — John and Timmy's ball game date, the whole family's night on the town and Nettie's 12-hour attempt at getting away from her confining, regret-laden life all happen off stage— the between scenes interludes could easily be clunky. Thankfully, they're not.

The actors make the most of the most emotionally engaging scenes. Daily makes Leary's mood swings border on being bi-polar, but he pulls back enough to avoid his being too extreme to win our sympathy. Harry Feiner's set and Barbara A. Bell's costumes reflect solid research and a feel for the period.

Given the talky and fairly inactive nature of this play, Ms. Wright might have trimmed it by at least ten minutes. However, there's nothing anyone could do to keep the bouquet of roses that gave Mr. Gilroy his title from being an instantly predictable metaphoric device. Still, Daily and Schultz ably create the no-holds-barred reality of two people who call a truce long enough to set their son free but whose own future together would be resistant to peaceful co-existence even in the near-distant future of more available marital therapy.

The Subject Was Roses
Frank D. Gilroy
Directed by Amy Wright
Cast: Carol Schultz (Nettie Cleary), Dan Daily (John Cleary), Matthew Amendt (Timmy Cleary)
Scenic Design: Harry Feiner
Costume Design: Barbara A. Bell
Lighting Design: Stephen Petrilli
Sound DesignJane Shaw
Fight Director: Rod Kinter
Stage Manager: Dale Smallwood
Dramaturg: Kate Farrington
Running Time: 2hours plus intermission
Pearl Theater at New York City Center Stage I I West 55th Street
From 4/09/10; opening 4/18/10; closing 5/09/10
Reviewed by Elyse Sommer 4/15/10 press Preview
Highlight one of the responses below and click "copy" or"CTRL+C"
  • I agree with the review of The Subject Was Roses
  • I disagree with the review of The Subject Was Roses
  • The review made me eager to see The Subject Was Roses
Click on the address link E-mail:
Paste the highlighted text into the subject line (CTRL+ V):

Feel free to add detailed comments in the body of the email. . .also the names and emails of any friends to whom you'd like us to forward a copy of this review.

You can also contact us at Curtainup at Facebook , Curtainup at Twitter and at our Blog Annex
Subscribe to our FREE email updates with a note from editor Elyse Sommer about additions to the website -- with main page hot links to the latest features posted at our numerous locations. To subscribe, E-mail:
put SUBSCRIBE CURTAINUP EMAIL UPDATE in the subject line and your full name and email address in the body of the message -- if you can spare a minute, tell us how you came to CurtainUp and from what part of the country.
South Pacific  Revival
South Pacific

In the Heights
In the Heights

Playbill Broadway Yearbook


©Copyright 2010, Elyse Sommer.
Information from this site may not be reproduced in print or online without specific permission from