Google
Web    
www.curtainup.com
The Canterbury Tales, a CurtainUp London review CurtainUp
CurtainUp

The Internet Theater Magazine of Reviews, Features, Annotated Listings
www.curtainup.com


HOME PAGE

SITE GUIDE

SEARCH

REVIEWS

FEATURES

NEWS
Etcetera and
Short Term Listings


LISTINGS
Broadway
Off-Broadway

NYC Restaurants

BOOKS and CDs

OTHER PLACES
Berkshires
London
California
DC
Philadelphia
Elsewhere

QUOTES

On TKTS

PLAYWRIGHTS' ALBUMS

LETTERS TO EDITOR

FILM

LINKS

MISCELLANEOUS
Free Updates
Masthead
Writing for Us
A CurtainUp London London Review
The Canterbury Tales



It's Greenwich soon where many a slut does dwell.
---- Chaucer
The Canterbury Tales
Claire Benedict as Pertelote and Mark Hadfield as Chanticleer
(Photo: Stewart Hemley)
We are seeing the rise of a very special director in Gregory Doran and his time as an associate at the Royal Shakespeare Company confirms his talent. Now we have the very highest expectations of his productions and with justification, because the plays are reliably innovative and often thrilling. In this latest five and three quarter hour double performance production, we see Doran's ability to bring new life and modernity to a work of literature which is more than six hundred years old.

Mike Poulton was commissioned by the RSC to write a new adaptation for the stage of The Canterbury Tales of which, although the work was unfinished, the tales number almost forty. Poulton's adaptation includes twenty three of the tales. The best known are the bawdy, rumbustious stories of cuckolded men and lusty young wenches like The Miller's Tale and The Merchant's Tale or those stories taken from Italian sources of knightly chivalry and high etiquette.

Chaucer's work is based on the premise that a group of pilgrims were travelling on horseback from a tavern in Southwark to Canterbury Cathedral in Kent, to the shrine of the then recently martyred St Thomas Becket and decided to pass the time on the journey by telling each other stories. Each pilgrim is identified with an occupation and their tales reflect this. Country folk tell bucolic, graphic tales while learned scholars tell tales of erudition and the religious, tales of great piety. The plays are tackled in chronological order as they appear in the book, a detail which places two of the best known, The Knight's Tale and The Miller's Tale in the first act of the first performance. Chaucer's work is not just a collection of stories but a social commentary on England in the fourteenth century with detailed occupational information about people like the Pardoner (Dylan Charles), a seller of fake relics so that sinners could "buy" their redemption.

The ensemble performances are outstanding as we have come to expect from the Royal Shakespeare Company but what makes the production outstanding are the inspirational directorial touches. There are moments of modernity and wit. Chaucer's own tale of Sir Topaz is delivered as a rap, Absolon (Michael Jibson) the would-be lover and dupe in the Miller's Tale appears with long red flowing hair and a round face, he is Mick Hucknall of Simply Red.

The plays open with Chaucer's famous prologue spoken in the original Middle English and just as we imagine we might need surtitles to adapt to these strange words, the cast switch to a more modern translation. However by the end we are familiar with words new to most twenty first century ears, to swynk and to swyve, the first meaning to work hard, to labour and the second to copulate.

The opening tale, The Knight's Tale mounts a joust with men on stilts with silk canopies over the backs of the horses in a staging that takes one's breath away. In the Franklin's Tale some of the action is played out in shadow puppetry but the exuberant chicken chorus of the Nun's Priest's Tale reminded me of a hilarious cross between the pigeons in The Producers and The Muppets. This is the tale of the Cockerel Chanticleer.

Some tales show attitudes unacceptable today. The Prioress's Tale is of a Christian child murdered by Jews and grossly anti-Semitic. If I am unhappy with anything, it is with the change in emphasis which has resulted from the re-writing of the tales. I have studied only a few of these tales but one of them was The Clerk's Tale. This anachronism of a story tells of a swyneherd Grisel who is selected by the Lord of the Manor to be his wife. He tests her obedience by taking away her children to be killed, divorcing her and sending her back to her father without even her underclothes. Years later he summons her back to wait on his new bride who turns out to be the daughter she thought had been killed. She obeys throughout and is finally honoured by her husband. But what about the lost twelve years when she was cast back to the pigs? Now this tale was staged in an African setting -- why? Is this kind of treatment of women more acceptable in Africa? I don't think so. I noticed an icy, unengaged silence in the theatre when this tale was played. My own main quibble was in dressing Griselda in a white dress when she was living with the pigs and another white dress with a bit of lace when she was the Lady of the Manor. She needed to be covered in mud in her first existence. There was a lack of contrast between what should have been the grandeur of the manor house and the utter squalor of Griselda's hovel.

For my money Part I is finer than Part II but any unevenness is also Chaucer's as the tales are played in order, although there is some doubt about this order. This has to be the case because some tales like The Reeve's Tale is a response to The Miller's Tale and features a Miller's wife and daughter succumbing sexually to a pair of students. Although Chaucer's work was unfnished, Doran gives us a fitting climax as the pilgrims reach the martyr's tomb and each lights a candle there, irrespective of their social standing, this is a unifying moment. It is a moving finale. I hope that The Canterbury Tales will find a London audience and that people will be inspired to return to a good translation of the original tales.

A note of caution, should you be considering taking children, that the sexual staging is very explicit and realistic. Gregory Doran's boisterous production matches the lively stories which predated printing in England and were designed to be told by storytellers.

THE CANTERBURY TALES
Written by Geoffrey Chaucer
Adapted by Mike Poulton
Directed by Gregory Doran, Rebecca Gatward, Jonathan Munby

Starring: Mark Hadfield, Claire Benedict, Christopher Godwin
With: Nick Barber, Daon Broni, Dylan Charles, Paola Dionisotti, Lisa Ellis, Michael Hadley, Anna Hewson, Edward Hughes, Michael Jibson, Michael Matus, Barry McCarthy, Chu Omambala, Ian Pirie, Joshua Richards, Christopher Saul, Katherine Tozer, Darren Tunstakk
Design: Michael Vale
Lighting: Wayne Dowdeswell
Music composed by Adrian Lee
Sound: Jeremy Dunn
Movement: Michael Ashcroft
Musical Director: Sylvia Hallett
Running time: Part I - Three Hours with one interval, Part II - Two Hours 45 minutes with one interval
Box Office: 0870 950 0915
Booking at the Gielgud Theatre to 30th September 2006
Reviewed by Lizzie Loveridge based on 13th July performance at the Gielgud, Shaftesbury Avenue, London W1 (Tube: Piccadilly Circus)
London Theatre Tickets
Lion King Tickets
Billy Elliot Tickets
Mary Poppins Tickets
Mamma Mia Tickets
We Will Rock You Tickets
Theatre Tickets
London Theatre Walks


Peter Ackroyd's  History of London: The Biography



London Sketchbook



tales from shakespeare
Retold by Tina Packer of Shakespeare & Co.
Click image to buy.
Our Review


©Copyright 2006, Elyse Sommer.
Information from this site may not be reproduced in print or online without specific permission from esommer@curtainup.com