HOME PAGE SITE GUIDE SEARCH REVIEWS REVIEW ARCHIVES ADVERTISING AT CURTAINUP FEATURES NEWS Etcetera and Short Term Listings LISTINGS Broadway Off-Broadway NYC Restaurants BOOKS and CDs OTHER PLACES Berkshires London California New Jersey DC Philadelphia Elsewhere QUOTES TKTS PLAYWRIGHTS' ALBUMS LETTERS TO EDITOR FILM LINKS MISCELLANEOUS Free Updates Masthead |
A CurtainUp Review
All's Well That Ends Well
By Les Gutman
In some summers, the advertising for Shakespeare in the Park pushes a theme connecting the plays being offered. A few years ago, as an example, the pairing of Romeo and Juliet with A Midsummer Night's Dream was announced by pink posters for "Free Love in Central Park". This summer, the most obvious connection between All's Well and Measure for Measure, with which it is being performed in repertory (and which will be reviewed during the week following this review), is that both plays have been denominated as among Shakespeare's "problem plays". Free problems in Central Park doesn't offer quite the same enticement. The truth is, All's Well is not just a problem play (the term really only means that it can't easily be classified as a comedy or any other standard form), but also a difficult play, and a troubling play, and a frustrating play. For me, there is a very particular stumbling block, and it centers on one question: What is it about Bertram (André Holland) that drives Helena (Annie Parisse) to take extraordinary -- indeed shocking -- steps to have him as hers. Without a satisfying answer, the play is just a series of increasingly implausible occurrences punctuated by a very high proportion of disparate comic interludes. Daniel Sullivan, who directs the play with great clarity, offers little insight. We are left with my nagging question, and must thus decide if what else there is, is sufficiently entertaining to justify spending a lovely evening in the park. (The answer to that question is almost always "yes".) There are performances here to savor, though none are really knock-outs. At first blush, I thought Annie Parisse had been miscast as Helena, but as the show proceeded, I very much changed my mind, finding her combination of dogged if inexplicable perseverance and wistfulness oddly compelling, even if not wholly illuminating. As her quest, André Holland is less compelling, and like much of the cast, more than adequate, but not by much. Happily, his character has not been overly "characterized" and he is not played with the sort of "attitude" that easily could be heavily layered onto him. Moreover, aside from a singular gesture in the opening moment of the play -- Sullivan begins and ends the play with dancing, there is no real sense of a class-based dismissal of Helena that seems to be intended by the language. John Cullum gives a very fine turn as the King of France, while the other musical theater notable in the cast, Tonya Pinkins as the Countess, is disappointing: a wasted opportunity. Perhaps the biggest surprise on the plus side is Caitlin O'Connell's Widow as well as Kristen Connolly as her daughter Diana (that's the one Bertram's after in Florence); their scene together is one of the most enjoyable of the evening. Less successful are the comedians. Both Reg Rogers as Parolles and David Manis as Lavatch seem to have landed on one note and avoided venturing away from it. In the former case, it's a particular shame, because both the actor and the role can be better. In the latter case, I'm afraid anyine playing the part is at a disadvantage in my book: it just seems like so much surplusage. Scott Pask's set follows a fairly familiar pattern for the Delacorte: upstage scaffording (this time decked out in ironwork of the fin de siècle variety, in keeping with the overall theme) affording some nice two-tiered moments and a bit of privacy beneath. (I think, though, that we could've done without all the chairs he had onstage, which the servants spend an inordinate amount of time moving around and fussing with.) Jane Greenwood's costumes are lovely and perfect as they usually are and Peter Kaczorowski manages to create some very effective moods with his lighting. The usual sound designers in the park provided good effects and Tom Kitt's music, including ample underscoring, which both sounded good and fit well. I may never be satisfied by this play, but if I am to be it will probably require the sort of radical rethinking that's unlikely to come at Daniel Sullivan's hands. In the end, I think the character I like the most here is Diana, and that quote of hers above sums things up nicely for me. Yes there are many plays of Shakespeare that have lots of dishonesty, but none seems so rooted in it as this one. And so that, I suppose, is its legacy to me.
|
![]() Slings & Arrows-the complete set You don't have to be a Shakespeare aficionado to love all 21 episodes of this hilarious and moving Canadian TV series about a fictional Shakespeare Company width="100" border=0> South Pacific ![]() In the Heights ![]() |