A CurtainUp Review
By Elyse Sommer
As Mags sets up her portrait amidst all the packing up, a lot of emotional baggage is unpacked so that the audience, and not just Mags, gets to see the Churches — as they were, and as they are. That means that we learn why Mags has been such an infrequent visitor to the gracious Beacon Hill home and the distinguished Brahmin parents she nevertheless loves and whose approval she still covets. We also learn to look beneath the eccentric Fanny's relentless chatter and vivacity.
This quiet, little play was a breakthrough for Tina Howe, winning much praise (and almost a Pulitzer) for the way it explored dual dual themes — the problems of aging and a grown daughter's having to put aside conflicting feelings about a difficult mother to see the devotion and strength beneath her rigidity. Howe built her story around Fanny and Gardner Church's final days in Boston's crème-de-la-crème Beacon Hill area. The senior Churches' lives are on a downward spiral — financially and in terms of Gardner's career as a published poet who once won a Pulitzer-Prize and palled around with the likes of Robert Frost . On the other hand, Mags' career as an artist is moving into high gear. But as Mags can't feel truly successful without her parents approval, so Fanny isn't quite as breezy and almost festive about the move as she seems to be.
And so, Fanny reminisces non-stop as she wraps the family silver and tries on her designer thrift shop treasures. . . Mags creates a setting for the parental portrait . . . . and Gardner wanders in and out from the study where his failing memory has him work at a book that's a mere jumble of typed copies of the poems he sill know by heart. Thus, bit by bit, the details of the family dynamic, past and present, crystallizes. While Fanny was indeed a tough mother (it was her dealing with Mags's eating problem that remains a festering wound even though it triggered her career as an artist), her current impatience (as Mags sees it, her cruelty) with Gardner is the weary exasperation of a frightened, harried care giver.
The Churches move to a summer resort cottage is undoubtedly a terrible choice, given Gardner's problem, which thirty years ago was still not commonly identified as Altzheimer's. It's a condition that's going to get worse before it gets better and the Churches' modern day counterparts would probably sell both their homes (even in a bad economy Beacon Hill and Cape Cod real estate is still prime) and move into one of Boston's several upscale assisted living apartment complexes. But then Ms. Howe's Churches are unique period pieces so I suppose a revival should be "as is" and rely on the actors and the play's inherent delicacy to carry the day. And there's the rub.
Carl Forsman, the Keen's artistic director who also directed the companys's revival of Howe's Museum ten years ago, is certainly blessed to have Kathleen Chalfant and John Cunningham as the aging Boston Brahmins whose love for each other must pass the test of their not so golden years. However, his tempo is too slow and he's directed the actors, especially Chalfant, to overplay their eccentric ways. This is especially true of the beginning when Fanny pretty much dominates Beowulf Borit's nicely designed living room as she holds a conversation with herself about the meaning and value of the family treasures being sorted into boxes to go to an auction house and boxes to take with them. Given the directorial emphasis on shtick, even a magnificent pro like Chalfant can't prevent Fanny's interrupting herself to get Gardner's attention from coming off more shrill than amusing.
This emphasis on a too broadly jokey tone tends to also put a spotlight on some of the dated aspects of the script. Unless you're collecting social security, the joke about a Lily Dache label in both Fanny's thrift shop pillbox hat and Gardner's sweater is not going to have you fall off your seat laughing. That's not to say that Chalfant's numerous costume changes courtesy of Jennifer Paar aren't fun fun. She carries off even a scene in satin slip and hat with the ladylike aplomb that defines her character.
The pace does pick up with the arrival of Megs though Kate Turnbull doesn't really give her character the emotional depth called for. The confrontation between mother and daughter would be a lot more powerful if Chalfant didn't have to do all the heavy lifting. John Cunningham's Gardner does manage to steal your heart and Howe's more airy humor surfaces occasionally, as when we see Chalfant and Cunningham contentedly chomp away at a box of saltine crackers.
Does Mags finish her portrait? The answer is yes. However, the only portrait the audience sees, and the one that Mags herself comes away with, is that of the flesh and blood Fanny and Gardner's touching finale.
Slings & Arrows- view 1st episode free
Anything Goes Cast Recording
Our review of the show
Book of Mormon -CD
Our review of the show